Echelon: A Dream Deferred
by Nick Christenson
November 1, 2009
The "shelving" of Boyd Gaming's Echelon project is well over a year
old now. The Las
Vegas Review-Journal was one of many sources to report on construction
halting. When Boyd mothballed their endeavor, they indicated that
they'd revisit the project in a year. Well,
apparently, they've done so, and they've now indicated that construction
won't be resuming any time soon.
Some local commentators on the industry expressed what sounds like a mild
dismay at the news. Certainly, there can't be any surprise in this
announcement. Given the state of the economy and the industry, restarting
their construction process right now would be silly. Of course, Boyd
still has a line of credit available to them that was originally slated
for use on Echelon, but there are better uses for that money now.
The
first possible use is as the Sword of Damocles they're hanging over
Station Casinos. After Station started renegotiating their debt after
the financial crisis hit, Boyd "graciously" offered to help them out
by purchasing some of their key assets. Station was less than receptive,
but the offer is a win/win for Boyd. Either they get Station assets at
fire sale prices, or the bond holders have leverage to hold out for a
better deal, leaving Station in a tougher financial spot when they emerge
from restructuring. This is hardball business at its finest.
Assuming Boyd doesn't end up with the Station properties, the next
most likely use for that money would be to buy up MGM's interest
in the Borgata, the very successful Atlantic City joint venture
between the two companies. Even though MGM dodged a bullet by
securing the financing necessary to complete City Center, they could
use the cash. While opening City Center means they aren't spending
money on construction, given that they have to start to service the
debt they've accumulated building this behemoth, and given that folks
are more than a little reluctant to shell out for vacations at the
rate they did just a couple of years ago, any reasonable offer to
liquidate a non-core asset will be seriously considered.
So, when will Boyd restart Echelon construction? Even though some
sources have thrown around a three year time horizon, the truth is
that nobody knows, not even Boyd. However, we can make some predictions
about preconditions before they'd consider.
First, Boyd probably needs new partners. I find it doubtful that
General Growth Partners will be able to participate in such a venture
for quite some time, as they are going through a bankruptcy of their
own. Boyd's other Echelon partner, Morgans Hotel Group, may become
interested again, but there's no guarantee that they'll want the same
deal, or will have the same time horizons as Boyd. Certainly, they
appear to be in better financial shape than GGP, but the economic
downturn has to have hit them hard as well.
In any case, it takes quite some time to ramp up a construction project
that has been shut down for so long, especially now that the cranes are
being taken down. Echelon is no longer just on hiatus. Project
managers have been released, and it's likely that market influences
and the ever-changing vibe in Las Vegas will make alterations necessary
to the original designs before the cranes go back up. Revisiting the
plans will take considerable time itself.
Finally, not only do the financial conditions need to improve enough so
that building in Las Vegas makes sense again, but even after the
economy improves enough for tourists to return, there has to be enough
extra traffic to absorb the additional capacity that City Center,
Fontainebleau (one way or another it will open before Echelon gets under
way again), the mothballed Octavius Tower at Caesars Palace, and
likely even the Cosmopolitan, will provide.
So, how does this time line go? Well, the economy recovers, people start
to spend, people come to Las Vegas in numbers exceeding those in early
2007 so that the new rooms are full too, then Boyd can dust off their
plans, make deals, and begin construction. Even the most pie-eyed
optimist can't imagine that happening in less than three years, with
another two years before something opens. It would seem to me that
five years until construction begins probably reflects a rosier view
of the future than is warranted. It's not unreasonably pessimistic to
admit the possibility that we'll be staring at girders from the corner
of Las Vegas Boulevard and Convention Center for a decade.
So, while the skeleton on the site that used to hold the Stardust may be
an eyesore, we may as well get used to it. It will be there for a while,
and, as it turns out, Boyd Gaming halting construction when they did
was undoubtedly a prudent move. Sure, nobody wants such a visible
reminder of Las Vegas' failings featured so prominently on one of
this country's most recognizable byways. Nonetheless, it's hard to
imagine an inexpensive solution that will satisfy's Echelon's
neighbors.
In the mean time, perhaps the best
thing to do is to gaze upon the steel framework as a reminder that there
is always the temptation to cross the line between luxurious excess and
outright depravity, between ambition and rapacity. As a community and
an industry we had crossed that line. The party is over now. It's time
to clean up what parts of the mess we can, and live with what we must.
|